[mythtv] Testers wanted for DVB EIT rework
piotr.oniszczuk at gmail.com
Wed Dec 21 13:49:57 UTC 2016
I may try to test on NC+/Polsat Polish DVB-Sat providers.
Should I look at this work as:
1."better way of doing the same things"
2."new functionality is provided"
If it is \2 - what needs to be tested to verify is new functionality works
(in other words - what test-case(s) You need to conduct on my SAT provider)
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 2:30 PM, roger <roger at beardandsandals.co.uk> wrote:
> I really appreciate if anyone could review and test my current rework of
> DVB handlng of EI and SD tables. An archive of the changed files is
> attached to ticket#12932 *here**
> This rework fixes the identification of EI and SD sub-tables and adds
> caching of EI sub-tables. The identification now complies with ETSI EN 300
> 468 V1.15.1 (2016-03), as below.
> sub_table: collection of sections with the same value of table_id and:
> • for a NIT: the same table_id_extension (network_id) and version_number;
> • for a BAT: the same table_id_extension (bouquet_id) and version_number;
> • for a SDT: the same table_id_extension (transport_stream_id), the same
> original_network_id and
> • for a EIT: the same table_id_extension (service_id), the same
> transport_stream_id, the same
> original_network_id and version_number.
> NOTE: The table_id_extension field is equivalent to the fourth and fifth
> byte of a section when the
> section_syntax_indicator is set to a value of "1".
> The code has only been tested against DVB-T here in the UK. It needs
> testing against other broadcast providers. I have not fully tested the
> changes in the SD table handling. These are only used when scanning for
> mythtv-dev mailing list
> mythtv-dev at mythtv.org
> MythTV Forums: https://forum.mythtv.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the mythtv-dev