[mythtv] Questions on #6138 (HDHomeRun multirec)

Joel Means means.joel at gmail.com
Tue Feb 3 23:41:19 UTC 2009

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Yeechang Lee <ylee at pobox.com> wrote:
> Bill,
> I have a couple of questions on your ticket providing multirec patches
> for the HDHomeRun. I also use -fixes.
> * I'm not 100% clear on which patches to apply. You mention three in
>  the initial ticket but a fourth shows up later. I presume we are to
>  use the latest versions of 132, 133, 134, and 135?
> * You mention a risk to the database. I know that's a theoretical risk
>  with any patch and I'm not afraid of potentially destroying my
>  database, as I'd do a backup just before trying your patches out,
>  and have an automated-backup system. Even if the patch is 100% fine,
>  though, I would not want to alter the database in a way that would
>  prevent an upgrade to 0.22, though. Is that something I should be
>  aware of? I didn't see anything in the code about protocol changes,
>  so I don't think so, but would like to make sure.
> --
> Yeechang Lee <ylee at pobox.com> | San Francisco CA US
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-dev mailing list
> mythtv-dev at mythtv.org
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev

I found this reading through the changlog for the ticket:

>>    *   attachment  133-hdhr.multirec.3.patch added
>> Updated multirec patch. Includes skip tuning patch and fix for crash during recorder teardown.

It looks like you don't need 135, as it was incorporated into 133.  I
will have to give this a try.

More information about the mythtv-dev mailing list