[mythtv-users] .24 upgrade issues

[John Freeman]

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Brian Wood <beww at beww.org> wrote:

> On Thursday, November 18, 2010 10:55:42 am Mike Perkins wrote:
> > Brian Wood wrote:
> > > On Thursday, November 18, 2010 07:34:42 am John Freeman wrote:
> > >> Thanks for the info.
> > >>
> > >> My general home network is 192.15. and the HDHomeRun and
> > >> second Ethernet port are on 172. So the server is on 2 networks
> > >> with the 172. being just it and the HomeRun. The auto-discovery
> > >> does not work this case.
> > >
> > > So you are using non-RFC-1918 addresses for your home network
> > > (192.15.x.x)? You can do that of course, but it might be safer to
> > > use non-world-routable addresses.
> >
> > Good luck with that. My cable provider, Virgin Media (UK), supplies
> > DHCP information via a server in the 10.x.x.x range, and I regularly
> > see misconfigured hosts on the wire with 192.168.x.x addresses.
> >
> > Not that any of that gets past my firewall, of course, but it's
> > better to be safe and use the reserved ranges internally.
> >
> > Of course, 192.15.x.x may have been assigned to him by his ISP...
>
> Not likely:
>
> NetRange:       192.15.0.0 - 192.15.255.255
> CIDR:           192.15.0.0/16
> OriginAS:
> NetName:        WORLDACCESS-NET
> NetHandle:      NET-192-15-0-0-1
> Parent:         NET-192-0-0-0-0
> NetType:        Direct Assignment
> RegDate:        1984-10-23
> Updated:        1998-10-16
> Ref:            http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-192-15-0-0-1
>
> OrgName:        World Access, Inc.
> OrgId:          WORLDA-1
> Address:        115 Wolf Creek Trail
> Address:        Suite 2000
> City:           Broomfield
> StateProv:      CO
> PostalCode:     80020
> Country:        US
> RegDate:        1984-10-23
> Updated:        1998-10-16
> Ref:            http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/WORLDA-1
>
>
> It's never a good idea to use "real" addresses unless you own them, as
> you pointed out there are enough cases of misconfigured routers in the
> world to make even RFC-1918 addresses subject to problems.
>
> Of course, if you are careful, there is nothing to prevent your using
> such addresses without problems, but assuming that nobody will route
> RFC-1918 addresses is not a safe assumption.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users at mythtv.org
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
>

it's a typo, I indented 192.168.15.x.

sorry for the confusion......
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users/attachments/20101118/c915bc8c/attachment.htm>