[mythtv-users] another scheduling mishandling
Jason Ward
jasonfward at gmail.com
Thu Jun 24 15:31:49 UTC 2010
On 24 June 2010 16:24, David Engel <david at istwok.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:50:58AM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> > I do have Reschedule Higher Priorities disabled in an effort to get
> > "best fit" per the other ongoing thread. Changing that either way
> > didn't seem to make a difference.
>
> The scheduler does not use "best fit". It always uses first fit with
> some simple heuristics. One of those heuristics is using priority to
> control the order in which things are tried.
>
> Hmmm, that misunderstanding maybe my fault. When you said
"When SchedMoveHigher is enabled, the scheduler moves recordings around one
at a time and the first fit wins. it does not continue on looking for
"better" fits. Consequently, recordings might get moved to lower priority
inputs or channels."
I assumed you meant when SchedMoveHigher is disabled, the scheduler moves
recordings around one at a time looking for a fit and continues looking for
"better" fits until the "best" fit is found.
Jason
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users/attachments/20100624/85ecea8d/attachment.htm>
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list