[mythtv-users] Samba or NFS?

[David Morrison]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert Johnston wrote:

> On Apr 9, 2005 3:49 PM, John Andersen <jsa at video.homelinux.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Saturday 09 April 2005 8:52 am, Tony Godshall wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps cfs? It's encrypted nfs, and security is a concern if
>>> on wireless even more than wired because it does not require
>>> physical access.
>>
>> Oh for pete's sake..... Someone is worried about efficiency
>> enough to think about abandoning Samba for some supposed slight
>> advantage of nfs and you propose adding an encryption layer in
>> there?
>>
>> Network security should be handled at the network level not the
>> file system level.
>
>
> And if he's using 802.11x, he should at least have WEP, if not WPA,
> enabled

I use WEP so I'm happy with that. Adding an encrypted file system =
more data to transmit = slower performance.

Dave
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCWNo9Tvi0LnvdKq0RAiAIAJ9HWT5ITaMyuc3qN9SHs1H6pR7kpACgmsZi
U9FtDlrJpKRANpEtRRAITxU=
=IUon
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----