[mythtv-users] Regarding slave backends

[Kevin Kuphal]

I see, so I could basically take the smallest drive possible on the slave
backend just for the OS, etc.  and NFS mount the disk storage from the main
box for actual storage.  Seems so obvious now.

Thanks.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mythtv-users-bounces at mythtv.org 
> [mailto:mythtv-users-bounces at mythtv.org] On Behalf Of Bryan Halter
> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 9:44 AM
> To: Discussion about mythtv
> Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] Regarding slave backends
> 
> 
> I would NFS mount the storage so that you can save everything 
> to one drive.
> 
> Bryan
> On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 10:20, Kevin Kuphal wrote:
> > Right now I have a single frontend/backend server and I'm 
> considering 
> > an option in the near future to add a slave backend.  I 
> know that with 
> > the two tuners available to the scheduler that it will pick 
> and choose 
> > (same lineup on both cards), but I was wondering, from a space 
> > management standpoint:
> >  
> > Is it possible for a recording to have an affinity for a 
> certain card?  
> > In other words, if I have tons of disk space on my current 
> > frontend/backend box but I only put a medium sized disk in my slave 
> > backend with a PVR-250 for recording transient shows 
> (things I watch 
> > and delete), is it possible for me to choose recordings like Blue's 
> > Clues that I keep and do not delete to record on the master backend 
> > where all the disk space is?
> >  
> > Thanks,
> > Kevin
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> > _______________________________________________
> > mythtv-users mailing list
> > mythtv-users at mythtv.org 
> > http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
>