[mythtv-users] Biostar ideq200n anyone- Don't use nforce?

Eric Aversa eaversa at omnesys.com
Tue Aug 26 01:35:59 EDT 2003


Interestingly, in a fit of guilt after maligning the product of valiant
engineers in such a public forum, I did some research at a listserv
sponsored by Nvidia
(http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?s=&forumid=14) and
found this advice which I have yet to try:

http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=7f9c1278638f0a83b5367e8
cf754f179&threadid=13712&highlight=A7N266

Quote:
" seems to managed LAN working properly 
HW:
asus a7n266
athlon 1800XP
ram: 128MB

SW:
BIOS 101nvm.awd
Mandrake 9.1
but with common kernel 2.4.21 rc8 with Alan Cox latest patch

BIOS options: Interrupt mode PIC 
kernel option ACPI=on

or:

BIOS options: Interrupt mode APIC
kernel option ACPI=off

in both cases nvnet driver optimalization must be set
to CPU (on throughput hungs)
in modules.conf :

options nvnet optimalization=1

throughput optimalization (=0 and default) is broken "

I have yet to try this, but previously I had been under the assumption
that if a vendor provided a chipset, it should work with a driver they
provide- but I guess maybe that some BIOS settings might be beyond their
control...

Eric Aversa
email : eaversa What omnesys.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Joiner [mailto:steve at daisyhill.net] 
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 11:00 PM
To: eaversa at omnesys.com; Discussion about mythtv
Subject: RE: [mythtv-users] Biostar ideq200n anyone- Don't use nforce?


I've got the same motherboard (A7N266-VM) and I'm also getting horrible
performance nvnet.  Whenever there's any network traffic, the system
slows to a crawl.

I'll probably spend one more night trying to get it to perform correctly
before I pop in an old netgear PCI card.

If anyone has had this problem with nvnet an can shed some light, I'd
really appreciate it.  Otherwise, consider this a warning if you're
planning on getting the A7N266-VM.

Steve

On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 17:03, Eric Aversa wrote:
> Joe-
> 
> Did you really mean that nforce chipset is good for linux? I just got 
> my Asus A7N266-VM working with Myth, and it was a nightmare of an 
> experience. Granted it was my first experience with Myth, but I was 
> unprepared for the following:
> 
> While Nvidia is unusually nice about providing Linux drivers (their 
> binary graphics drivers seem pretty good), they are proprietary and 
> nforce seems to have issues. RedHat cannot provide them, so I was 
> unable to get network working as part of the install of the OS (or do 
> a network
> install- which was my original intention). Once I inserted a CD with
the
> nforce drivers, I found first that network performance was abysmal- 10
K
> per second on my 100 megabit LAN, and that accessing the network would
> cause Linux to hang hard. I abandoned using the nvnet altogether and
> threw in a spare 3com card (3com seems to always just work with
Linux!)
> 
> Nvaudio seems to make mplayer complain, whenever I do mplayer 
> /dev/video0 (my PVR250 card) the video will stumble from time to time 
> and mplayer complains about the audio interface- though I have not yet

> had real problems with Myth- except while trying to watch a live 
> channel which Myth is recording.
> 
> I specifically purchased this motherboard as it was recommended by Ars
> Technica- and I am so ashamed of that decision in hindsight. Unless I 
> have done something wrong, or this is particular to the ASUS, or my 
> experience is unusual (which does not seem the case after trolling the

> linux nforce mail list archives) I am wondering if the nforce is not 
> in fact really, really bad for linux. If I am wrong, I would really, 
> really like to be corrected.
> 
> While things are now working, I am not using the onboard video (using 
> G4 Mx 440SE), not using onboard NIC, and am now looking at not using 
> on board audio.
> 
> Eric Aversa
> eaversa at omnesys.com
> Omnesys Technologies, Inc.
> Phone : (845) 735-5000
> Cell : (914) 629-5691
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mythtv-users-bounces at mythtv.org 
> [mailto:mythtv-users-bounces at mythtv.org] On Behalf Of Joseph A. Caputo
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 4:35 PM
> To: Discussion about mythtv
> Subject: RE: [mythtv-users] Biostar ideq200n anyone?
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mythtv-users-bounces at mythtv.org
> > [mailto:mythtv-users-bounces at mythtv.org]On Behalf Of Rick Beebe
> > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 4:04 PM
> > To: mythtv-users at mythtv.org
> > Subject: [mythtv-users] Biostar ideq200n anyone?
> >
> >
> > I've been lurking here for quite a while, watching the progress of
> > Mythtv and searching for the 'ideal' box to run it on. There are 
> > several contenders, including the mini-itx M10000 and the Asus
Pundit 
> > (space and noise are big cosiderations). One that's recently caught
my
> 
> > attention is the Biostar IDEQ 200n. It's pretty reasonably priced
> > considering what it
> > contains:
> >
> > http://www.biostar-usa.com/ideqdetails.asp?model=ideq+200n
> >
> > Is anyone using one of these? I'd be interested in hearing about it.
> >
> > --Rick
> 
> Unfortunately, it's only got 1 PCI slot, so I wouldn't be able to put 
> both my tuner card and my WLAN card in it.  Meanwhile, its got 
> on-board GeForce 4 MX, making the AGP slot a big waste of space...
> 
> Other than that, my first impression is that Linux-wise this is better

> than a Pundit, because of the nForce chipset.  I wonder if it would 
> support a PCI riser card?
> 
> -JAC
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users at mythtv.org 
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users



More information about the mythtv-users mailing list