[mythtv] Master build failure after Fedora23 > 24

[John Pilkington]

On 08/12/16 12:30, John Pilkington wrote:
> On 06/12/16 22:52, John Pilkington wrote:
>> On 06/12/16 18:46, John Pilkington wrote:
>>> On 06/12/16 13:37, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>>> Also as a data point my packages on RPM Fusion are not having any
>>>> problems on any release of Fedora, though it's on fixes/0.28, not
>>>> master.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Richard
>>>
>>> Stuart, Richard:  Thanks for your replies.  I haven't been able to
>>> investigate today but will do so asap.  I came across other non-myth
>>> posts with the same error that seemed to point to interference from
>>> other references to /usr/include, and my log is full of those.  The
>>> specfile was based on one of Richard's for 0.28 with a few tweaks, so
>>> I'll re-examine his latest for clues - and perhaps see if I can build
>>> again for SL7, on which I'm currently running 0.29pre189
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>> As another data point, on the fc24 box,
>>
>> [john at HP_Fed SPECS]$ mock -r fedora-24-x86_64-rpmfusion_free --buildsrpm
>> --spec mythtvmaster29pre229p#12901mock.spec --sources=../SOURCES
>>
>> followed by
>>
>> [john at HP_Fed SRPMS]$  mock -r SL-7-x86_64  --rebuild
>> mythtv-master-0.29.229.s.fc24.src.rpm
>>
>> has created a full set of el7 packages - with the audiograph patch from
>> #12901, which seems more benign than most of my later attempts.  But I
>> haven't installed them yet on the production box.  Reported rebuild time
>> was 53 min.
>
> Running ansible installed nothing new, and I have tried both with and
> without Richard's patch of 16 April on the legacy-encumbered
> INCLUDEPATH, which probably affected only the plugins.
>
> I still haven't been able to build rpms for fc24, but running
> ./configure and make in the 'mock' directory left behind,
>
> /var/lib/mock/fedora-24-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/mythtv-master/mythtv
>
>
> seems to have succeeded.  I did it as 'john' and suspect that it won't
> have used the clean 'mock' environment, but that probably isn't a
> problem.  I don't know how safe (file locations etc) it will be to
> install when I have previously run (in fc23) an rpm-based version.  Any
> guidance appreciated.
>

I took the plunge and did 'sudo make install'   After setting up 
shared-library access and building plugins, operations seem to be back 
to normal - but I have never used and haven't tested autostarting 
features or many of the plugins.  Thanks to Peter Bennett et al for the 
'Build from Source' wiki.

> John P