[mythtv-users] OT: Aspect ratio broadcast rant
f-myth-users at media.mit.edu
f-myth-users at media.mit.edu
Thu Feb 18 20:44:49 UTC 2016
> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:55:13 -0600
> From: Jack McGee <jack at greendesk.net>
> FYI, in my day job I run a PEG station, our only outputs are SD
> 4:3 on cable companies, AT&T Uverse, and our Internet live stream.
> We produce everything in 16:9 HD, but I center cut it to send
> 4:3. We produce all the content and make sure all titles are 4:3
> safe. If I were to letterbox into a 4:3 frame, it would actually
> be lower than SD, since it is using less pixels.
I don't know about your actual customers, but if I were one, I'd
rather you letterboxed and sacrificed a slight bit of resolution than
what I usually see, which is (sometimes but often not) title-safe
placement, but (almost never) action-safe placement---heads and bodies
routinely cut off on the left and right, etc. Losing a tiny bit of
resolution on a talk show is inconsequential; not being able to even
see who's talking at the moment is much more annoying. This seems
to be more and more common as people assume that everything is 16:9
and that 4:3 displays must not exist any more.
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list