[mythtv-users] desktop environment efficiencies.
Michael T. Dean
mtdean at thirdcontact.com
Thu Nov 12 21:45:10 UTC 2009
On 11/12/2009 04:27 PM, Richard Morton wrote:
> I am asking this qustion as I am thinking about building a new mythtv
> install on a new drive to ease the upgrade; well not ease it exactly,
> but make it so that I can complete it in bite-sized chunks with
> minimal outages from the SOs point of view.
> So I built the current system with MythBuntu; but I am wondering if,
> as MythTV uses the Qt framework whether it would be more memory
> efficient to install Kubuntu compared to Xubuntu on the server with
> myth packages (and maybe myth control centre for very rare use).
> I have no idea how to find out how much memory each installation would
> require (I'm interested in RAM and CPU usage, not particularly
> interested in disk space).
> Ideas, thoughts and knowledge welcome...
It might be RAM-efficient, but it would likely be far less
CPU-efficient. TTBOMK, xfce is a relatively lightweight desktop
environment; whereas KDE is a heavyweight.
What would be most efficient, however, would be to use something other
than a desktop environment--some lightweight window manager like Fluxbox
or, even better, RatPoison. RatPoison has about a 300kiB incremental
RAM cost. Fluxbox is around 1MiB.
More information about the mythtv-users