nick.rout at gmail.com
Sun Mar 1 22:24:21 UTC 2009
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:49 AM, jedi <jedi at mishnet.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 01:01:42PM -0500, Chris Pinkham wrote:
>> * On Sat Feb 28, 2009 at 09:21:22AM -0600, Brent Norris wrote:
>> >> If Hulu are giving you something for free don't you think that fact
>> >> makes it (morally) even more important to obey the conditions they do
>> >> impose?
>> > No I don't in this case, because their conditions are stupid. If
>> > someone were to give you a car for free, but only if you promise to
>> > drive it on gravel roads do you think you would find that dumb? Would
>> > you drive it on whatever roads you wanted to?
>> To put it into a couple other perspectives....
>> What if you think that the GPL is stupid? MythTV is given away for
>> free with certain stipulations. You have a license to use it as long as
>> you agree to those stipulations. If you think they are stupid, then
> Nope. The GPL requires no "license" for use.
The GPL /is/ a license.
More information about the mythtv-users