[mythtv-users] Summery of my problems
Michael T. Dean
mtdean at thirdcontact.com
Sun Jan 29 02:05:51 UTC 2006
On 01/28/2006 08:29 PM, Rudy Zijlstra wrote:
> Michael T. Dean wrote:
>> On 01/28/2006 12:46 PM, Dylan R. Semler wrote:
>>> Michael T. Dean wrote:
>>>> On 01/27/2006 01:07 AM, Robert Johnston wrote:
>>>>> On 1/26/06, Dylan R. Semler <dsemler at macalester.edu> wrote:
>>>>>> For analog, the picture quality is pretty bad (noisy)... The
>>>>>> picture quality is much better using tvtime and those lines do not
>>>>> As for the noise, make sure that Myth is tuning into the same
>>>>> frequency (EXACTLY the same frequency) as TVTime is. It sounds like
>>>>> Myth's off by a few Khz.
>>>> Being off by a few KHz shouldn't matter. Many of the NTSC cable
>>>> channel frequencies are off by 12.5 KHz (and the same goes for IRC,
>>>> and HRC varies by 5-15KHz), but the tuner hardware's fine-tuning
>>>> mechanism should still be able to find the appropriate center
>>>> frequency. See
>>>> (which was totally ignored by the guy complaining in Trac that the
>>>> frequencies are off) for an in-depth listing of what frequencies are
>>>> off and why it shouldn't matter.
>>>> If you (Dylan) want to try an academically-correct list of frequency
>>>> definitions, I'd be happy to create one for you (against SVN--just
>>>> let me know which frequency list you're using: ntsc_bcast,
>>>> ntsc_cable, ntsc_hrc, ntsc_irc (I'm assuming NTSC based on your
>>>> e-mail address)), but you'll have to do all the testing because I
>>>> don't have any RF-modulated sources.
>>> Well it's worth a shot. I'd love to get better picture quality. I'm
>>> using ntsc_cable.
>> OK. Attached is a patch...
>> If there really is a
>> difference (and I still don't think there will be)
Read this ^^^^
> probably good to improve, but....
> for the silicon tuners i know about, (which are both the ones we use on
> our products as well as some others), this makes no difference at all.
> Most modern (silicon) tuners are able to finetune to the correct
> frequency if the initial frequency is within 125KHz of the correct
> We make use of this is the scanning algo, as this makes it possible in
> Europe to scan with 250KHz steps in case we have to do a frequency sweep....
> Please keep in mind, Europe cable does not have any standard to adhere to.
That's what I've been saying all along--since someone mentioned that the
frequency might be off by a few kHz... However, it's hard to convince
people it's not a problem if they can't test it for themselves... ;)
Personally, I don't think it's worth changing the definitions in the
source, but between the "This is so trivial to fix that it's silly not
to." comment in Trac ( http://svn.mythtv.org/trac/ticket/610 and my
), and "common wisdom" about using the finetune values to adjust
frequencies by a few kHz (which is often suggested), I figured a patch
on the list that lets people see for themselves that it doesn't matter
would be the best way to get other people to see it my way.
More information about the mythtv-users