[mythtv-users] Upgrading to 0.19 on fedora

[Larry K]

Axel,

I was also wondering if you can comment on the future of FC3 relative to
forthcoming atrpm releases.  That is, am I living on borrowed time with FC3
and the upgrade to FC4 or whatever is looming large as a necessity?

Or perhaps this is more a function of what kernel(s) are to be supported in
FC3 down the road, so as long as I can run the kernel you are supporting,
then everything is good.

Larry

On 2/12/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 11:35:11AM -0500, Larry K wrote:
> > I have a potentially dumb question about kernels and how you decide
> which
> > ones to build to.
>
> security, space & time
> It usually boils down to supporting the last 1-2 kernel releases.
>
> > I notice that the you are now supporting 2.6.12-1.1381for the
> > kernel-specific packages.  Since I am still running 2-6-12-1.1378, I
> > assume I need to upgrade my kernel in order to keep up with the
> > binary packages?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Or am I overlooking something obvious?  Heretofore, when I attempted
> > to upgrade a package that needed a kernel I wasn't running, I just
> > upgraded the kernel too.
>
> But you also need to follow up with all other kmdl packages, too.
> --
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users at mythtv.org
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users/attachments/20060223/a535c347/attachment.htm