[mythtv-users] WinTV PVR-250 vs 350
adeffs.mythtv at gmail.com
Wed Aug 16 19:42:23 UTC 2006
On 8/16/06, Daniel Kristjansson <danielk at cuymedia.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 17:14 -0400, Isaac Richards wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 August 2006 5:08 pm, Daniel Kristjansson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 14:55 -0500, David Schmidt wrote:
> > > > There's absolutely no reason to choose the higher priced 250 over the
> > > > 150, unless you can pick up a 250 cheaper used or on clearance.
> > >
> > > Not true, NTSC closed captioning isn't working with the 150 and the
> > > 250 creates a higher quality capture. The capture quality is improving
> > > with the 150/500 cards and someday the ivtv driver might support
> > > caption embedding on the 150/500, but for now 250 is the way to go
> > > if you want captions or want the best quality analog capture.
> > ivtv's done CC embedding on the 150/500 for a while now.
> In an SVN revision? I know there was a patch available in April,
> but I didn't think it made it into 7.0 (not in changelog), and
> last I checked (a couple weeks ago) captioning was not yet working
> with the new API..
> I'm using the in kernel ivtv drivers here and the quality of the
> PVR-500 recordings has increased immensely, but there are still
> way too many denoising artifacts. It sort of looks like an often
> played video tape recorded in ELP mode.
internal or external tuner? I find that my 150 with an external cable
box (even over composite) looks darn good. I just wish Myth had a real
scaler so I could go from 720x480 to 1920x1080 without using Xv's poor
scaler (which bmayland spoke about last may, though I haven't seen
anything come of this, and would love to have it as an option for at
Before you ask, read the FAQ!
then search the Wiki, and this list,
Mailinglist etiquette -
More information about the mythtv-users