[mythtv-users] Better think twice before choosing an
FS especially for LVM
Brandon Beattie
brandon+myth at linuxis.us
Thu Sep 15 20:20:30 UTC 2005
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 04:08:02PM -0400, Tom Lichti wrote:
> But you wouldn't need to shrink the filesystem to replace the disk with
> RAID5, if you use enough disks (minimum 3). Of course there is a trade
> off in terms of available data space, but if what you put on there is
> important to you, it's worth it. At least for me it was. Performance is
> increased as well, since you have more spindles to read and write from
> simultaneously.
.. You need to re-read what I said. My point was not avoiding a failed
disk problem. My point even exists if you simply want to remove a disk,
for any reason -- You can't unless you're going to put a new disk in its
place, that is the problem/hidden pitfall to XFS, JFS, and Reiser4 with
LVM. I have no desire to get into the raid debate because it's
completely unrelated to the problem I brought up. If you're curious why
I chose not to do raid, e-mail me and I'll explain off-list.
--Brandon
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list