[mythtv-users] matrox g200-tv
Peter M Schuh
pschuh at Stanford.EDU
Sat Feb 8 07:56:48 UTC 2003
i doubt you can trade off cpu usage for disk space and get better quality
Aren't you already using the lowest workable resolution?
A quick search in the archives yields a discussion on this
The thread was called Box Processor Limits
Here is an excerpt from one of the mesages :
> You're better off with more
> raster lines so I'd also prefer 320x480 over 640x240 for
> that virtual size. So, a better list from high to low
> would be:
>
> 720x480 640x480 480x480 352x480 320x480 480x240 352x240 320x240
>
would a Socket 370 Celeron 1.4A GHz fit in there
or maybe a Celeron 1.0 GHz
it would fix the problem for about $60
I take it it's a small price to pay to keep the girlfriend happy
anyone know
what is a lowest powered celeron is,
that would do 480x480 or even 320x480 ?
rt
On February 6, 2003 07:23 am, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> What combination of encoder settings will give me lower CPU utilization,
> even at the expense of larger files? Right now, I'm running at:
>
> 320x240 resolution
> RTjpeg quality 170
> luma filter 0
> chroma filter 0
>
> [Using the CVS version.] This is on a PIII-450. I'd like to up the
> resolution (my gf's complaining about the quality); I've got disk space
> to spare, so being able to trade off CPU for disk would be a win for me.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Ian
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users at snowman.net
> http://www.snowman.net/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list