[mythtv] status of MythTV wrt Coverity Scan

[Eric Sharkey]

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Stuart Morgan <stuart at tase.co.uk> wrote:
> Of that 360 just a third are rated as 'high impact' and of those many are
> still trivial or false positives. It will take me a while to work through them
> and figure out how many of these deserve a fix.

I don't think Coverity does a particularly good job at impact
assessment.  There can be some serious problems that don't have a high
impact rating.

I see you modified #700472 with action ignore but you didn't set
classification false positive (which is what I was about to do).  Was
that intentional?

Eric