[mythtv] Qt 3.1 still supported?

[Daniel Kristjansson]

On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 01:34 +0200, Janne Grunau wrote:
> On Thursday 26 July 2007 00:37:57 Daniel Kristjansson wrote:
> > I thought we were still supporting 3.1, if we've switched to
> > 3.3 already then the change should stay. It looks like debian
> > stable is at 3.3.3 already, and debian stable is usually one
> > of the last to upgrade.
> >
> > But I would feel more comfortable about it if someone can
> > reference a post saying we have switched or Isaac pipes up...
> 
> I haven't found such a post. The requirred qt version changed in 
> http://svn.mythtv.org/trac/changeset/9225 to qt 3.2 as indicated in 
> http://svn.mythtv.org/trac/ticket/1363 and in 
> http://svn.mythtv.org/trac/changeset/11588 to 3.3.
> I find it a little bit strange that the online docs are from trunk.

Me too, that feels like a bug...

> > There are a few benefits to 3.3, like 64 bit int support,
> > that would be nice to be able to depend on.
> 
> The 64 bit ints were already added in qt 3.2 so the change is safe and 
> should stay.

So it looks like this was just for QImage::copyBlt()? If we
want to support Qt 3.1 it wouldn't be hard to fix this, but
then again it Qt 3.2 is pretty widely supported...

-- Daniel