[mythtv] Questions about which components are meant for FE and BE
Axel Thimm
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Sat Nov 25 21:12:42 UTC 2006
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 03:05:16PM -0500, Boleslaw Ciesielski wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> > There are various reasons to keep packages granular or non-granular,
> > space on fs is only one reason. The distinction into a frontend and a
> > backend part seems to have served users for a long time now. If there
> > are now frontless, backendless parts that make sense packaging
> > differently it should be considered.
>
> (trying to revive this older thread)
>
> It seems that at least mythjobqueue, mythcommflag and mythtranscode can
> be run anywhere so maybe they could be separated into separate package
> or packages.
Any suggestion for a name? What are the dependencies, e.g. given a
set of sub-packages:
frontend
backend
setup
?
?
?
which should depend on which?
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-dev/attachments/20061125/e7c3d035/attachment.pgp
More information about the mythtv-dev
mailing list