[mythtv] Anyone got a moment to put a couple of trivial patches

[Tom E. Craddock Jr.]

Buzz wrote:
>  
> 
>>>Anyone got a moment to apply a couple of trivial patches 
>>
>>into SVN?   .. Or
>>
>>>should I just let them be gotten to whenever someone feels like it? 
>>>
>>
>>Normally it's whenever someone gets around to looking at it.
> 
> 
> Thanks for getting round to looking at it.
> 
> 
>>RE: 936, none of the other plugins explicitly have 
>>-L$${PREFIX}/lib or -L/usr/local/lib yet they are able to 
>>link against libmyth correctly, are you sure mythbrowser even 
>>needs that line at all?
> 
> 
> No, I'm not sure it needs it, but I AM sure that when installed to something
> other than /usr/local, it doesn't need /usr/local
> I err-ed on the side of minimal change, as impact-analysis of library
> linkages isn't a strong-point.
> 
> 
>>RE: 938, committed this minus the comments since the commands 
>>for allowing remote access are already covered more 
>>extensively in both the HOWTO and other places.
> 
> 
> Thanks and fair-enough.
> 
> 
>>RE: 941, I think the concensus was to not put things like 
>>.spec files in SVN, but I'll let others comment on that.
> 
> 
> Even if it's specifically to do with SVN?   
> 
> 
>> 
> 
> 
> Personally, I see the benefits of going further and fully integrating the
> RPM building process into the 'make' process, so that you could do a 'make
> rpm' (or even a 'make deb' or 'make pkg') as the end-point of the build
> process.  Makes the standardisation/management of installed files WAY
> easier.... And backing-out an install/upgrade as simple as 'rpm -e'.   
> 
> In-fact, if anyone else (other than me) would like to see that too,
> speak-up, and I'll see what I can do. :-)
> 
> Buzz.
> 
> 
> 


I just dlaoded your spec files from the svn trac page, thanks.  I would 
be interested in seeing that RPM and dep/pkg would be avail as a build 
option.  BTW, made a comment in the page for the Ticket for the Spec files.

Tom