[mythtv-users] Recommendations needed for new FE box
Ashu Desai
ashu.desai at gmail.com
Thu Jul 26 15:07:37 UTC 2018
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 4:59 PM Steve Greene <sgreene820 at gmail.com> wrote:
> If myth supported advanced deinterlacing for Intel, it would be a
> no-brainer: the NUC or similar minimalist boxes. Even with that limitation,
> it may work, depended on your tolerance for flickering in interlaced
> content.
>
I think the flickering tolerance depends on each individual - so if there
is a better option I would like to go with it - not sure how okay or
annoying it would come across for me when watching. And if i invest a few
hundred bucks on a box and that turns out to be not ideal - then it's such
a waste.
Is there something that folks here have - i am open to buying bare metal
and building one up myself...
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Ashu Desai <ashu.desai at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone
>> I currently have a ZOTAC ION running CentOS 7 and 0.29 myth frontend.
>>
>> I just had it upgraded from CentOS 6 and 0.28 a few months back - so it's
>> all running smoothly - i don't have a major issue.
>>
>> However, being that it's the old ZOTAC ION, the H.265 doesn't work.
>>
>> The VDPAU "slim" works but i can feel the brunt if I watch a movie just
>> after having started a scan.
>>
>> All in all, looking for a nice "mac mini" sort of budget friendly,
>> smaller footprint, that looks nice aesthetically so it's not a problem
>> putting right below the TV, and with good enough nVidia that will not have
>> me change the hardware in a year or so.
>>
>> Thank you in advance
>>
>> Ash.
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users/attachments/20180726/9b68ba53/attachment.html>
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list