[mythtv-users] modernizing mythtv

[Hika van den Hoven]

Hoi Saul,

Saturday, May 10, 2014, 6:50:37 PM, you wrote:

> On Sat, 10 May 2014 17:56:42 +0200
> Hika van den Hoven <hikavdh at gmail.com> wrote:

>> To come back to a more fundamental issue. No server/backend
>> application should depend on a graphical environment other then WEB.
>> Running X for those is a wast of resources. That is one of the main
>> reasons I find Windows unsuited for server applications. On my server
>> running mythbackend among others I have only the most basic graphical
>> card present, so I can if needed watch the boot process and implement
>> new kernels. The only reason X is even installed is Mythsetup, which I
>> only start at need. The rest I manage by ssh or more and more the web.
>> Originally a lot of people were running both back and frontend on the
>> same machine, but nowadays more and more people are splitting this up.
>> So I see mythsetup as an archaic inheritance of old times, that
>> should be replaced by a more modern web interface.

> I have completely headless BE, I upgrade the kernels and run setup
> remotely no problem. No X installed.

You're sure you don't have a 'hidden' X-server running on your
backend to facilitate? Anyway a X application will use more bandwidth
on the network, since it is not optimised that way.
If not, can you quote the commands you use to start mythsetup
remotely. I'm interested.

Tot mails,
  Hika                            mailto:hikavdh at gmail.com

"Zonder hoop kun je niet leven
Zonder leven is er geen hoop
Het eeuwige dilemma
Zeker als je hoop moet vernietigen om te kunnen overleven!"

De lerende Mens