[mythtv-users] mythv 0.27 test packages (future RPM Fusion)

[Monkey Pet]

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:07 PM, John Pilkington <J.Pilk at tesco.net> wrote:
>
>> On 07/10/13 13:48, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>>> Latest 0.27 source RPM:
>>>
>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.**com/u/34775202/mythtv-0.27-0.**
>>> 4.fc19.src.rpm<https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/34775202/mythtv-0.27-0.4.fc19.src.rpm>
>>>
>>> Includes fixes from git through last Friday.
>>>
>>
Thanks Richard, I loaded it last night.


>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Richard
>>>
>>
>> OK.  Many thanks.  I have el6 i386 rpms built from this installed and
>> running on the laptop - but the version number reported is still the
>> 317d5b7 of the 0.27 release and the changelog says it's still 0.26.1-2 :-)
>>
>
> Yeah, I'm running both SRPMS out of the same directory structure for
> rpmbuild so they're picking up the same ChangeLog but that will be fixed
> with the full 0.27 release.
>
>
> I've looked at the specfiles on both machines and am even more confused;
>> the vers_string and gitrev for the previous build in f18 are both
>> v0.27-1-g5b917e8; today's build in el6 has v0.27-20-g0536d47 and
>> v0.27-1-g5b917e8. It looks as if these may be the markers for the
>> same-epoch master branch.
>>
>
> Not sure what you mean there... The earlier srpm was v0.27-1 (one commit
> from the original v0.27 tag in git) and the ver_string is what is actually
> used, the _gitrev is only used when the macro "branch" is set to "master",
> so ignore _gitrev. I could actually take this out of the RPM Fusion spec
> file since it will never run master but I'm trying to harmonize the RPM
> Fusion spec with the mythtv upstream spec.
>
>
> I'm not using mock and a few remains of older builds are still around, but
>> I don't see the reported mythfrontend --version in another specfile.
>>
>> The laptop still uses the old 'Watch Recordings' layout, too, although I
>> renamed the old themecache folder, and recordings-ui.xml is the same on
>> both boxes.  All rather odd.  But I do appreciate your efforts - and Myth
>> seems to be working rather well.
>>
>
> Can't help you there...
>
> Thanks,
> RIchard
>
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users at mythtv.org
> http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users/attachments/20131008/80fd8b23/attachment.html>