[mythtv-users] Temporal 2x vs Temporal-Spatial 2x

[Neil Cooper]

--- On Tue, 2/7/12, Mark Lord <mythtv at rtr.ca> wrote:

> From: Mark Lord <mythtv at rtr.ca>
> Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] Temporal 2x vs Temporal-Spatial 2x
> To: "Discussion about MythTV" <mythtv-users at mythtv.org>
> Date: Tuesday, February 7, 2012, 7:37 AM
> On 12-02-06 09:09 PM, Govindarajan
> wrote:
> > Could anyone point me to an objective analysis of the
> two types of
> > de-interlacing techniques in VDPAU? Also, is the
> difference
> > noticeable? I am thinking of getting nvidia gt520
> (silent card) but it
> > looks like it can only do Temporal 2x at NTSC frame
> rates. My quest
> > for the mythical silent (non atom) FE/BE set up
> continues, hopefully
> > not for long.
> 
> I can see the difference here.  The "Advanced/2X"
> deinterlacing spends more
> effort on motion prediction/compensation, for smoother
> playback with less
> blurring of movements on screen.
> 
> The "Temporal/2X" deinterlacer is also very good, but the
> difference can
> be seen as slightly more motion blur compared with the
> "Advanced/2X" mode.
> 
> ASUS markets a fanless GT-530 card that uses heatpipe
> cooling.
> But what's remarkable about it, is that it takes up only a
> single PCIe slot width,
> very unusual for high-performance fanless cards.  Since
> it has 96 "shader engines"
> (little CPUs), it can handle all of the current VDPAU
> features without issue.
> 
> The card is also low enough height to fit inside an Antec
> Fusion case,
> with space to spare.  Still a "full-height" card
> though.
> 
> Cheers
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users at mythtv.org
> http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
> 

This one I have is both passive and half height (sorry for reposting). I had to buy a half-height bracket kit separately though as it didnt come with one.
card:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814162081
kit:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814998301