[mythtv-users] Virtualisation in the home network -- ready for	mainstream?
    Jon Whitear 
    jon at whitear.org
       
    Wed Sep  2 23:39:31 UTC 2009
    
    
  
On 03/09/2009, at 6:08 AM, Raymond Wagner <> wrote:
>>
> Step back, and think about what you actually want.  Do you just want
> these services in a separate file space for easier management?  Do you
> want these services partitioned off from the rest of the system for
> security and stability?
I want to be able to run pre-packaged appliances such as TrixBox so  
that things "just work". For example Gentoo's Asterisk build doesn't  
support IMAP mailboxes properly - I'm assuming that an appliance will  
(if it says it will). I also want to ease system maintenance e.g.  
Upgrading my Mythbuntu VM should have no impact on my Trixbox VM.
> Do you want to be able to migrate these images
> between different hardware (while live?)?  Do you want to run these
> services on a different OS (or kernel version)?
Different hardware? No. Different OS? Yes, as above.
> If you want better isolation for your services, look
> into vservers, which each have their own memory space and network
> address, in addition to a chrooted
>
Vservers use a common kernel, so won't really do what I want.
Thanks for the input. It does seem that virtualization is the current  
buzzword but in this instance I think it is the right approach to  
achieve what I'm trying to do.
Cheers,
Jon
>
>
    
    
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list