[mythtv-users] Multiple HDHomeruns

[Fraser, Douglas]

Well I was thinking about splitting the storage between the two backends.  I may have to record 4 or 5 HD feeds at once.  That's way I was going for a master / slave setup and putting all the tuners and slave on the subnet.

dfraser

From: mythtv-users-bounces at mythtv.org [mailto:mythtv-users-bounces at mythtv.org] On Behalf Of Mitch Gore
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 6:56 PM
To: Discussion about mythtv
Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] Multiple HDHomeruns

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Fraser, Douglas <dfraser at king5.com<mailto:dfraser at king5.com>> wrote:

Sirs:



I have 3 HDHomerun tuners that will sit on a subnet with a Master Frontend / Backend and a Slave Backend.  The master will have two nics so the frontend can interact with the main network.  My question is, do the tuners in the HDHomeruns (six tuners total) have to be hard assigned to either the master or slave? Or can the boxes be set to just pick an unused one?  And if I have to assign them is it better to split them up, say something like all tuner 0's to the master and all tuner 1's to the slave, or both tuners in a single HDHomerun to master or slave?  Thanks for any help.



dfraser

_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users at mythtv.org<mailto:mythtv-users at mythtv.org>
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users

I would just put all tuners on the master.  I assume that is where the storage is.  Do you have storage and/or tuners in your slave backup?  what is its purpose.

You for sure do NOT want to assign the same tuner to mult. backends.

--
Mitchell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users/attachments/20090808/57864623/attachment.htm>