[mythtv-users] `Mythbackend leaks memory` continued

[Udo van den Heuvel]

Ray Lischner wrote:
> An increase by 10% in virtual memory size is not significant. Keep
> running and observing. That may be the first indication of a leak, but
> it's too soon to tell.

%CPU %MEM    VSZ   RSS TTY      STAT START   TIME
 7.2  9.1 393468 88688 ?        Ssl  16:34   4:27
 5.2 11.8 443152 115084 ?       Ssl  Jun23  39:17
 5.7 12.6 451428 122892 ?       Ssl  Jun23 126:25
 5.8 13.6 461224 132536 ?       Ssl  Jun23 213:50
 5.9 14.8 473084 143824 ?       Ssl  Jun23 300:29
 6.0 16.0 485440 156256 ?       Ssl  Jun23 391:59
 5.9 17.0 495228 165496 ?       Ssl  Jun23 475:35

A bit sooner than planned but these results already give some trend
info. Memory related ficgures only go up after the first set of numbers.
Interestingly the CPU doesn't appear to be stable after the first sample
(which was not at the same time of day as the others).
The CPU-time per day (see TIME collumn) isn't a steady increasing number.

What do we see here? Do you need a graph?

Udo