[mythtv-users] linux updates suck
David Brodbeck
gull at gull.us
Mon Sep 10 17:08:57 UTC 2007
On Sep 8, 2007, at 6:27 PM, Brian Wood wrote:
> IMHO the real problem is that the Linux kernel itself has become
> such a
> moving target that it is hard for groups like LIRC/IVTV to keep up
> with
> the efforts of Linus and Co. to "not be bored".
Personally, I really feel like dropping the alternating stable/
unstable kernel release pattern was a bad idea. I would have rather
had a stable 2.6 and then a 2.7 tree for the new stuff. It took a
good dozen releases for 2.6 to really become stable enough for day to
day use.
That said, current 2.6 kernels really blow 2.4 out of the water when
it comes to memory management. My 2.4 systems suffer from allocation
failures caused by memory fragmentation, and have to be rebooted
every few weeks as a result; I've never seen that in 2.6.
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list