[mythtv-users] Slow MySQL query after delete
David Brodbeck
gull at gull.us
Thu Sep 6 21:56:17 UTC 2007
On Sep 6, 2007, at 2:36 PM, f-myth-users at media.mit.edu wrote:
> Oh, whoops. Hadn't considered that. (Does Myth have a "suggested" or
> (gulp) "supported" set of storage engines, or is it claimed that any
> storage engine MySQL supports will "work"? I'm assuming 99% of
> everybody leaves theirs at the default, but of course we don't know.)
I'm actually curious if there are any performance benefits to using
one over the other. My understanding is InnoDB's main benefit over
MyISAM is transaction support, which MythTV doesn't use, so I'm
guessing no. There may be other factors I'm not thinking of, though.
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list