[mythtv-users] New RPMS avialable. cdrtools unresolved dep?

[Nowhere]

On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:40:01PM -0700, Brad DerManouelian wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 03:38:52PM -0400, list at onnow.net wrote:
> >> Thanks for the new rpms Axel.
> >>
> >> You will find new RPMS avialable for download.  I assume a mythweb 
> >> repair is contained within...
> >>
> >> You may find that there is a failed dep for cdrtools that is not 
> >> avialable in atrpms.
> >>
> >> I built this src rpm
> >> ftp://chuck.ucs.indiana.edu/pub/array2/linux/fedora/linux/core/
> >> updates/testing/5/SRPMS/cdrtools-2.01.01.0.a10-0.FC5.1.src.rpm
> >>
> >> and find that it build these:
> >> Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/
> >> cdrecord-2.01.01.0.a10-0.FC5.1.i386.rpm
> >> Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/cdrecord-
> >> devel-2.01.01.0.a10-0.FC5.1.i386.rpm
> >> Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/
> >> mkisofs-2.01.01.0.a10-0.FC5.1.i386.rpm
> >> Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/
> >> cdda2wav-2.01.01.0.a10-0.FC5.1.i386.rpm
> >> Wrote:
> >> /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/cdrtools-
> >> debuginfo-2.01.01.0.a10-0.FC5.1.i386.rpm
> >>
> >> Now, is cdrtools an actual package or a bundle of some kind?
> >
> > The dependency is bogus, I copied it verbatim from a mail and it was 
> > the name of the src.rpm, while it should had been one or more binary 
> > packages. Fix for FC5 is being uploaded. See also
> >
> >   http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=890
> >   http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=891
> >
> 
> Everything I read about this is FC5-specific, but I'm seeing this on
> FC4 as well. Can I expect that will be updated as well?

Yes, with the equivalent package release tag, that's why I didn't add any
fc5 tags to the reports. I just built the FC5 versions for now and pushed
them out to get the larger portion of users happy and FC4, EL4 and all the
rest will follow later.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

-----------------------------------------------------
Hey Axel,

No joy, I'm still getting the same dep error. Does it take a while to update
or something?

Thanks for all the work!
Eric