[mythtv-users] OT: Fedora repos?
Dylan R. Semler
dsemler at macalester.edu
Sat Mar 18 04:45:39 UTC 2006
With FC5 coming out on Monday, I'll be doing a few re-installations.
This time around I'd like to get my yum repositories strait and without
complications. Unfortunately, there seems to be some confusion
regarding enabling ATrpms.
I would like to enable atrpms, along with the RPMForge repositories for
my 3rd party software, however Stanton-finely warns against it just
above on this page:
http://stanton-finley.net/fedora_core_4_installation_notes.html#Yum
which I guess is based on this information
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnMahowald/ATrpmsWarning
which seems pretty strong. However, the atrpms page maintains that it's
completely compatible with many of the non-livna repositories. Well,
the technically say that they are in "cooperation," which doesn't
necessarily mean that they are compatible.
http://atrpms.net/repos/
However, according to what Axel has said on this list, the only way to
reliably update myth is through enabling the entire atrpms repo and doing
yum update
yum update myth\* is very bad and can result in problems and therefore
shouldn't be used
So what does one do? These people on the fedora sites seem to say that
atrpms is incompatible with the *core* fedora distribution and "is not
advised." However, the atrpms site seems to indicate the contrary, and
that is is compatible with RPMForge and the like. Furthermore, Axel
maintains that the only proper way to update myth is to have the entire
repository enabled in yum.
What have people been doing? Is enabling atrpms entirely not as
dangerous as people make it out to be, or should I just forget atrpms
and build from source?
Dylan
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list