[mythtv-users] mythtv .19.1 released?
Paul Bender
pebender at san.rr.com
Sat Jul 8 16:25:53 UTC 2006
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 11:25 -0400, Michael T. Dean wrote:
>
>>Time.
>
>
> The fixes are applied to the fixes branch as they come right? So at any
> time aren't most recent fixes already applied just waiting for a package
> release? Is that release not as simple as "make dist", "upload"?
>
>
>>Since most (all?) packagers are using 0.19-fixes,
>
>
> Hrm. I have my doubts about this. I think than any packagers that know
> what they are doing know that you cannot just keep re-releasing the same
> package (i.e. as in rpm) version with newer and newer code. Package
> users will never see an upgrade. The version number has to increment to
> get an upgrade. Any I'd also hazard to guess most packages are not
> "inventing" point release numbers on their own. Any "professional"
> packager is waiting for an official "upstream" release before they
> repackage.
Not true. There is software version number and a package version number.
The package contains both, and an increase in either will cause the
package systems to say that the installed package is out of date. While
the myth software version number does not change when an updated fixes
patch is applied, then package version number does. As a result, the
software systems detect that the myth packages are out of date. ATrpms
has updated the fixes patch multiple times, each time incrementing the
package version number.
>>nyway, it's
>>probably not that high a priority.
>
>
> That I can't comment on. I don't know what bug fixes are actually on
> the fixes branch and if any fix more than just a nuisance.
>
> Cheers,
> b.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users at mythtv.org
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list