[mythtv-users] PVR-150 vs PVR-150 MCE

[Garry Cook]

> 
>  On 9/13/05, John Erickson <jerickso at gmail.com> wrote: 
> > 
> > On 9/13/05, Kevin Kuphal <kuphal at dls.net> wrote:
> > > Is there any reason to avoid the MCE version in a MythTV box? I only
> > > need the tuning capabilities, I don't care about the lack of FM in one 
> > 
> > > or IR in the other.
> > 
> > Nope, no reason to avoid them at all.
> > 
> > I run a pair of PVR-150MCE's in my backend.
> > 
> > -John
> > _______________________________________________
> > On 9/13/05, Ashu Desai <ashu.desai at gmail.com> wrote: 
> > > 
> > > What if I am running a PVR-250 and I am planning to get a 2nd tuner 
> > > card. Is there a reason why PVR-150 or PVR-150 MCE would have any problems 
> > > when it comes to drivers?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ash. 
> > 
> >  I doubt it. I run a PVR250, PVR250MCE and PVR500MCE in my box. The 500 
is just two 150s, so I think this should apply to you as well.
I'm even running on older drivers (don't ask me which ones) from the atrpms 
testing branch, I have not updated them in over 2 months. I guess I've 
finally joined the 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it' crowd.
 --g
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users/attachments/20050913/a2769adf/attachment.htm