[mythtv-users] Fastest file system

Jason Werpy jwwerpy at gmail.com
Fri Sep 9 13:58:05 UTC 2005


On 9/9/05, Sérgio Gomes <sergiomdgomes at netcabo.pt> wrote:
> "Fastest" is a bit relative, some are better in some situations, some
> are better in others...
> 
> Anyway, Reiser4 should be the fastest overall, and it has full
> journaling and atomic writes (which means you should never get your
> filesystem corrupted). It's also the newest, however, and could still
> have a few bugs left. It's also not available in the mainstream kernel,
> so you need to patch your kernel or get a patched one.
> 
> ReiserFS (aka Reiser3) is also pretty good, especially when handling
> lots of tiny files. Only has metadata journaling (directories and such).
> It is a lot better than ext3.
> 
> In fact, ext3 is one of the worst in terms of performance.
> 
> XFS only has metadata journaling. It's not optimized for your setup
> though, it is oriented for very large systems, with very fast disks. It
> has some problems with data loss in crashes or power shortages, because
> it stores quite a few things in RAM before writing to disk. Definitely
> not recommended for your setup.
> 
> These are the ones I know, although I've never tried Reiser4 (it was
> quite unstable in 64-bit mode until a while ago, so I never used it).
> 
> All these systems are (to several degrees) journalled, which means that
> system checking should be very fast, under one second or something,
> because they keep a log of activities, and they only need to check that
> log in case of problems.
> 
> 
> As to which, I've had no problems with ReiserFS, and I recommend it. If
> you like experimenting, do regular backups, and don't mind using a
> relatively new filesystem, then go for Reiser4, it should be the fastest
> and best in terms of journalling.
> 
> 
> Sérgio Gomes
> 
> ---
> Stef Coene wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >Currently, I have a 70 GB partition formatted as ext3.  It's a bit slow when
> >deleting big files so I want to reformat it.  But what's the best choice?
> >XFS is good, but what's the file system check speed?  Running fsck on my ext3
> >file system takes forever...
> >
> >
> >Stef
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >mythtv-users mailing list
> >mythtv-users at mythtv.org
> >http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users at mythtv.org
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
> 

I like reiserfs and am using reiserfs3 for my journaled partition. 
But speed wise it is actaully the slowest at deletes.  But that said,
it has other features I like.  It can be resized up OR down in size. 
I actually used this durning my last upgrade where I took some space
from my video storage to use for installing a new distro for rebuild. 
I think that xfs can only go larger in size..


More information about the mythtv-users mailing list