[mythtv-users] RAID on Fedora Core 3?
Paul Barker
pbarker at ntlworld.com
Mon Jan 17 18:43:50 EST 2005
Hi
>Looks like my RAID5 arrays have crap performance - esp. the master
array.
OK here are the stats from my RAID5 setup with 4 X Seagate 160Gb Drives
(all masters):
Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
--Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
--Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP
/sec %CP
gryffindor 1G 23157 83 43898 24 14863 8 17742 58 32670 10
369.4 2
------Sequential Create------ --------Random
Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
-Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
/sec %CP
16 1598 98 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ 1640 97 +++++ +++
4086 97
So I see the traditional high CPU on writes but reads are fast with
little overhead. Your figures do look worse than mine in places (mostly
in the small file tests, although you seem to be using much less CPU
time).
I'm not worried about the high write times as the volumes I have on the
array are mainly read. I host my music, digital picture and movie files
there.
For myth buffers and my db I have an XFS filesystem on a standalone
disk, and my OS is on a RAID 1 mirror on another 2 disks.
Just curious if you got any output in dmesg or /var/log/messages whilst
running. I didn't see anything but I'm guessing that if there were bus
timing errors that'd be where they'd be. Did you (dare) try running this
on the master and slave arrays at the same time ? I'm guessing it would
grind to a halt.
Regards
Paul
Paul Barker
pbarker at ntlworld.com
IM: spookt2000 at yahoo.co.uk
<http://www.plaxo.com/signature/> Powered by Plaxo
<http://www.plaxo.com/signature/> Want a signature like this?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users/attachments/20050117/18b463c8/attachment.html
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list