[mythtv-users] Best approach for TV output (composite/s-video)?
Jeff_Mitchell at accessbusinessgroup.com
Jeff_Mitchell at accessbusinessgroup.com
Thu Sep 23 09:04:44 EDT 2004
If I go the route of a scanline converter, what would the list suggest?
I've seen some people talk about the sub-$100 ones made by Avermedia, but
from what I remember, those comments are generally not complimentary.
Could someone correct me if I'm wrong, or suggest an alternative?
What this boils down to is that given a high-quality file to play back, I
would like the output from my Myth box to appear to be the same quality as
watching cable on my TV (a 7-year-old 32" Sony Trinitron).
Cory Papenfuss
<papenfuss at juneau
.me.vt.edu> To
Sent by: Discussion about mythtv
mythtv-users-boun <mythtv-users at mythtv.org>
ces at mythtv.org cc
Subject
09/23/2004 06:49 Re: [mythtv-users] Best approach
AM for TV output (composite/s-video)?
Please respond to
papenfuss at vt.edu;
Please respond to
Discussion about
mythtv
<mythtv-users at myt
htv.org>
> I'd tend to go with a video card versus the PVR-350 - it's much less
> complicated. :)
>
If you're going to buy a new vid card for the application, you
might
want to consider a scanline converter. It'll be the easiest way to get a
good
vid card interfacing with a TV without having driver, Xf86config file
option
woes, crappy quality, etc. I'm sure the quality is to some degree what you
pay
for, but I'd think that for $50-100 you could get a decent one? I'm a big
believer that the *less* "flicker reduction filtering" it has, the better
it
is... TV's flicker... get over it! :)
-Cory
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users at mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list