[mythtv-users] Nehemiah Performance

Tako Schotanus quintesse at palacio-cristal.com
Wed Sep 3 10:58:12 EDT 2003


Maybe I have the same GUI problem. Since upgrading to those newer VIA
display drivers the mythfrontend gui messes up completely any time it
tries to display a tree. The gui basically becomes unusable afterwards
because now none of the screens will paint correctly.

I'm still thinking about what would be the best way to try and solve
this. Getting the latest version of X from CVS for example.

-Tako

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mythtv-users-bounces at mythtv.org 
> [mailto:mythtv-users-bounces at mythtv.org] On Behalf Of and
> Sent: woensdag 3 september 2003 6:17
> To: Discussion about mythtv
> Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] Nehemiah Performance
> 
> 
> I now have myth more or less working and the first report was vastly 
> optimistic.
> Mplayer still looks great with full size and stream, but the video in 
> myth has to be much smaller *480x480) for my m10k to handle it!!
> 
> My screen graphics is also completely screwed up. Screens 
> don't redraw 
> and some graphics don't show up or move when a button is 
> pressed...etc. 
> Might be the video driver, but it's pretty wiesrd and I have no idea 
> how to fix it. I'm going to try to switch to another video drivers 
> (vesa generic), but if some one have a suggestions or recommendation 
> for my rh9-epiam10k system I'd greatly appreciate it.
> 
> thanks
> anders
> 
> 
> Sorry about the confusion.
> On Friday, August 29, 2003, at 09:02 AM, and wrote:
> 
> > I haven't fully installed mythtv 0.11 yet (using atrms from 
> berlin and 
> > I can't get the lirc to install/compile), but tried it out with 
> > mplayer and there was absolutely smooth video.
> >
> > I also originally tried on debian with the regular cvs xfree86-4.3 
> > drivers and had to settle for the via (with lots of mpeg and other 
> > undeclared and other errors) and had to settle for lower rez and 
> > birate, but even then I had bad sound unless I timeshifted 
> the content 
> > a little...The xfree drivers are still a little buggy 
> acording to vias 
> > opensource reprasentative and only provides 2d accl with 
> out the mpeg 
> > stuff.
> >
> > Too bad  the binary drivers are not available for debian. 
> I'm having a 
> > hard time adjusting to redhat world... ;-)
> >
> > rgds
> > anedrs
> >
> > On Friday, August 29, 2003, at 02:34 AM, Tako Schotanus wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> You got 16m/8m at 720x480 running with Myth Live TV?
> >> That would be seriously cool because I'm currently using something 
> >> like
> >> 5m/4m at 460x576 to get stutter free video.
> >>
> >> But I'm not using those binary drivers you mention but the drivers 
> >> that
> >> came with the CVS version of XFree86 some months ago.
> >>
> >> Did you have to do anything special to get those drivers to work?
> >> (Recompile X like I had to do for example) The reason I ask is that
> >> previous binary drivers I had encountered all seemed to use
> >> functionality/API from X that was not included in the 
> standard RedHat 
> >> 9
> >> version.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>  -Tako
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: mythtv-users-bounces at mythtv.org
> >>> [mailto:mythtv-users-bounces at mythtv.org] On Behalf Of and
> >>> Sent: vrijdag 29 augustus 2003 9:12
> >>> To: Discussion about mythtv
> >>> Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] Nehemiah Performance
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Are you using redhat 9?
> >>> If you are, there are binary video and accl mpeg drivers 
> available at
> >>> viaarena.com that really helps. I've been playing around with
> >>> it today
> >>> and even with the 16m/8m stream at 720x480 from my pvr250 I
> >>> didn't see
> >>> any problems.
> >>> I used to be running debian where there are no binary drivers
> >>> avaliable
> >>> for the cle266 and could therefore not take advantage of 
> the hardware
> >>> accl....at least that is what I think is making the big 
> difference on
> >>> my m10k.
> >>>
> >>> anders
> >>>
> >>> On Thursday, August 28, 2003, at 09:21 PM, rwk at americom.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Just to see if I could tell the difference, I set my record
> >>> resolution
> >>>> from 480x480 to 720x480.  However, when I started watching I was
> >>>> surprised to find that my 1Gh Nehemiah EPIA processor
> >>> couldn't handle
> >>>> it.  It sputtered every few seconds.
> >>>>
> >>>> I ran a top from another machine and indeed observed that
> >>> mythfrontend
> >>>> was using 99% of the cpu.
> >>>>
> >>>> My EPIA machine is connected to a TV through the onboard
> >>> S-Video out.
> >>>>
> >>>> As a comparison I tried the same thing on my Athlon 2200+
> >>> running a ATI
> >>>> Technologies Inc Radeon VE QY video card.  I was again
> >>> surprised to see
> >>>> that mythfrontend was using less than 0.1% of the CPU and X
> >>> was using
> >>>> about 10%.  Needless to say it plays without missing a beat.
> >>>>
> >>>> What is it about the EPIA (hardware or drivers) which 
> makes it soooo
> >>>> much slower than the Athlon system?  The difference is CPU
> >>> power is not
> >>>> enough to explain it.  Is it the video drivers?
> >>>>
> >>>> And why is all the processing in mythfrontend on the EPIA
> >>> box, and in X
> >>>> on the Athlon?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for any and all opinions!
> >>>>
> >>>> Dick
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> mythtv-users mailing list
> >>>> mythtv-users at mythtv.org
> >>>> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mythtv-users mailing list
> >> mythtv-users at mythtv.org
> >> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mythtv-users mailing list
> > mythtv-users at mythtv.org
> > http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
> 
> 



More information about the mythtv-users mailing list