[mythtv] [PATCH] DBOX2 Feed Implementation 2005-05-10

[Andrew]

On Thursday 12 May 2005 12:05, Andrew wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 May 2005 16:36, Levent Guendogdu wrote:
> > Andrew wrote:
> > >On Wednesday 11 May 2005 04:06, Levent Guendogdu wrote:
> > >
> > >Just tried this and are having problems adding capture cards, you add
> > > capture card, can be dvb or whatever but they dont show up on the list,
> > > also any previous cards I had configured have gone from the list
> > > aswell.
> > >
> > >The sql error is:
> > >
> > >DB Error (simpledbstorage update):
> > >Query was:
> > >
> > >Thats it. I would have thought the database would have had a schema
> > > upgrade?
> >
> > Yes, a schema upgrade is needed for this to work properly. The upgrade
> > does not work if your database has already reached a certain version.
> > For a quickfix do this in your mysql console:
> >
> > INSERT INTO profilegroups SET name = 'DBOX2 Input', cardtype = 'DBOX2',
> > is_default = 1;"
> > ALTER TABLE capturecard ADD COLUMN dbox2_port INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL
> > DEFAULT 31338;
> > ALTER TABLE capturecard ADD COLUMN dbox2_httpport INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL
> > DEFAULT 80;
> > ALTER TABLE capturecard ADD COLUMN dbox2_host varchar(32) NULL;
> >
> > The next patch (released in a couple of minutes) will upgrade the db
> > schema to 1083 automatically. If you apply it, please reverse the first
> > one.
> >
> > Keep me posted.
> >
> > Bye,
> >  Levon.
>
> Levon,
>
> I have tried the 2nd patch and had same problem but found that my db schema
> is allready 1083 so applied the above commands to mysql and that got it
> working. Now I do not have a dbox2 but a dreambox which should work the
> same as they both use tuxbox code. Anyway this is what the backend log
> says.
>  From looking at the log it seems to be talking to the dream but is failing
> in some places. Does this work the same way as Tuxvision? Ive tried
> Tuxvision and it works ok. I will keep digging, maybe there is something
> differnt on the dreambox stopping it from working. I would love to beable
> to use this as my dreambox is going to waste.
>
Ok, looking into it a bit more, found that the enigma http interface is 
similar but not the same as Neutrino Dbox2 http interface. For now I am going 
to try a dream image which uses Neutrino instead of the Enigma GUI. Will let 
you know how it goes.Down the road it will be good if we could add support 
for the Enigma http interface aswell, in the mean time I will be happy to 
just get it working.

Andrew.