[mythtv] MythMusic: MetaLibrarian RFC

Isaac Richards ijr at case.edu
Wed Mar 23 20:03:02 UTC 2005


On Wednesday 23 March 2005 02:56 pm, Matt wrote:
> hmmmm... reminds me of Sony
> (http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,117910,00.asp).  I think
> it's a bad  judgment call to write-off the feature to encode into mp3.
>  98% of my music library is MP3 and the rest is AAC.  I do _not_ want
> to introduce another format, or have to re-rip all my CD's into Ogg or
> anythings else.  Is it ok to have multiple formats... sure, but why?
> Audio compression formats are a dime a dozen, yet the majority of
> users have no desire to switch from using MP3.  Also, I have an
> iPod... I don't want Ogg and I never will.  Personally, this doesn't
> matter to me much either way because I don't use myth to rip, but I
> think it's a nice feature that any PVR with a music management plugin
> should have.  Why degress?  Unfortunantly, I'm not a developer but can
> it honestly be _that_ hard to accomplish these goals using MP3 versus
> other formats?  I mean, a large large percentage of open source and
> commercial software over the past 3 years have been directly related
> to the boom of MP3s so it doesn't seem like it's got to be that hard.
>
> Either way... I don't chime in much, and in all honesty, whatever you
> decide I won't mind, but I just think you can't throw out the idea of
> encoding into MP3's that easily.

See, you're not using a standalone system.  Why couldn't you simply continue 
encoding your music with whatever you used previously, and not use mythmusic 
for that task?  Your whole argument's spurious because of that.

Isaac


More information about the mythtv-dev mailing list