[mythtv] 'stable' tag proposal

[Frank Riley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Isaac Richards wrote:
> On Monday 21 March 2005 08:23 pm, andrew burke wrote:
> 
>>Look, it's common courtesy to bring up issues I have before I go and just
>>fork the code.  Forking a project can often cause lots of bad blood and
>>problems.  I do appreciate what all the devs have put together, I just
>>think that things can be handled a bit differently to improve the end-user
>>experience.  I never said what the developers have done isn't worthwhile,
>>but I do take issue with the way the project is being managed.  I offered
>>to help improve that situation numerous times, and the devs seem to have
>>decided it isn't help they're interested in, and that's their choice.  But
>>personally, I know I would be upset if someone forked a project I started
>>without at least raising the issues they had for doing so.
> 
> 
> You have _not_ offered to help improve the situation.  You've offered to help 
> move to subversion.  That's not the same thing.
> 
> Are you now changing your offer?

What Andrew is proposing would work just fine on CVS as well as subversion.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFCP4AY91+pr0EM9zgRAgaGAJ0Zs4G5nQz2Psh/M3tNnI2RaIwcGwCdEZYh
4yyM7UjPOlKJYtDGy7Uw+Pw=
=pE3l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----