[mythtv] Re: Re: pvr-350 performance patch - simplified

[John Harvey]

No we don't "require". There is a setting in settings.pro to use that can be
set to use the latest features. The default behavior is to use the header
file in myth and to only use 0.1.9 functionality.
In this and the previous patch I was careful to make sure we maintained
compatibility with 0.1.9.

At some point if 0.2 ever gets released then we can make a call as to what
base functionality we want to support.

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mythtv-dev-bounces at mythtv.org [mailto:mythtv-dev-bounces at mythtv.org]
> On Behalf Of Isaac Richards
> Sent: 04 February 2005 04:27
> To: Development of mythtv
> Subject: Re: [mythtv] Re: Re: pvr-350 performance patch - simplified
> 
> On Thursday 03 February 2005 08:48 pm, David Engel wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:33:40AM -0000, John Harvey wrote:
> > > So I guess I'm not that worried. I don't really want to maintain ivtv
> > > header files in every dependent project (and myth isn't the only one)
> but
> > > now that ivtv.h is simplified in the driver it would be easier than it
> > > was before since we should be able to just copy a new version in
> > > occasionally.
> >
> > Well, I don't have ivtv installed on the system where I build Myth so
> > I made the change for my own benefit.  The option to use an external
> > ivtv header is still there, though.
> 
> Does this mean we now require an unreleased version of ivtv?
> 
> Isaac
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-dev mailing list
> mythtv-dev at mythtv.org
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev