[mythtv] Proposed scheduler patch

[Steve Davies]

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Derek Atkins wrote:

> Steve Davies <steve at one47.co.uk> writes:
>
> > PS. Most people seem to forget that cards ALREADY have a priority. The
> > priority is card-id number, lowest ID has highest priority for the
> > scheduler.
>
> Yes, but there is no way to mark cards as "equivalent".  If you have
> multiple pvr-x50 cards why rank them?  I don't care if a recording is
> on card 1, 2, or 3 -- they are effectively the same.

If you don't care, and they are the same, why does it matter that MythTV
considers them to be prioritised? At least if there is a priority, the
result is more certainly determined.

Just make the priorities contiguous so that they are to all-intents the
same.
>
> > Cheers,
> > Steve
>
> -derek
>

Just my 2p.
Steve