[mythtv] Proposed scheduler patch
David Engel
dlengel at attbi.com
Tue Feb 10 22:45:20 EST 2004
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 08:20:25AM +0000, steve at nexusuk.org wrote:
> There are situations that priorities can't easilly handle. Say for
> example I have some shows with priorities:
>
> 1 - A
> 2 - B
> 3 - C
>
> Then I want to record show D... I want it to override B but not A. With
> a purely priority based system that's just not possible.
Which do you consider higher priority, A or C?
If A, just make sure to leave enough "recpriority" space between A and
B and insert D in there.
If C, you're effectively saying you like D more than B, B more than A
and A more than D, right? Is that really going to happen that often?
IMHO, not often enough to justify the added complexity and confusion
it causes.
> Also, if I
> schedule a show and it conflicts with something I haven't already told it
> about I want it to be hilighted so I can make a decision instead of the
> scheduler making assumptions.
Programs that can't be recorded because of conflicts will be
highlighted. This won't be done, however, if an rsOtherShowing can be
recorded.
David
--
David Engel
dlengel at attbi.com
More information about the mythtv-dev
mailing list