<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/19/19 1:25 PM, Phill Edwards
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAE2RtTPHZSrauOLp4uh89T+txJi7gZmKT9_C=YM=H0mNZmmotQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="auto">
<div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">My
Shield TV is connected to my Samsung UHD 4K via HDMI and
the TV sends <br>
the audio via optical cable to my AV Receiver. It's a 5.1
speaker system <br>
and Samsung says they send out the audio from TV to AV
Receiver in DTS <br>
format.<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Sorry this isn't an answer to your question. But
I'm interested why you connect the Shield to your TV rather
than to your receiver? Are there benefits to doing it your
way? I had always assumed it was better to connect the device
to the receiver which in turn sends the video signal to the
TV. </div>
<div dir="auto">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>I would love that but unfortunately my receiver is a bit old and
it's HDMI will pass 4K but only at 30 fps. I'm too cheap to
replace my receiver, so I just reconfigured everything. <br>
</p>
<p>Jim A</p>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>