<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Hika van den Hoven <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hikavdh@gmail.com" target="_blank">hikavdh@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hoi Dan,<br>
<div><div class="h5"><br>
Thursday, March 17, 2016, 9:38:14 PM, you wrote:<br>
<br>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Hika van den Hoven <<a href="mailto:hikavdh@gmail.com">hikavdh@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hoi Dan,<br>
><br>
<br>
> Thursday, March 17, 2016, 6:09:37 PM, you wrote:<br>
><br>
>> I have a two system setup with a master and a frontend. The<br>
>> frontend also has a slave backend that does recording (as the<br>
>> satellite box is where the frontend is at). Both boxes have access to a NAS nfs share.<br>
><br>
>> Recently, I noticed that even though I am playing a video on the<br>
>> master it appears to be routed from the frontend?<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
>> myth://Videos@host2/video.iso<br>
><br>
>> Why is this and how can I have either everything streamed from the<br>
>> backend or played locally? There is some shuddering and my guess is<br>
>> it is due to all the traffic back and forth (frontend is on a weak wireless connection).<br>
><br>
><br>
>> Dan<br>
><br>
> I guess because the slave did the recording, so it is owned by the<br>
> slave. A recording record contains the hostname. Possibly if you<br>
> change this to the hostname of the master... Of cause the path on both<br>
> machines should be the same. Also then playing back on the slave would<br>
> then again create a similar situation.<br>
> Alternatively, you could try adding the path on both machines to the<br>
> storage group. These records also contain a hostname field. I hope<br>
> that it then first tries to find the file on the requesting machine.<br>
> As I understand older version would catch it automatically from the<br>
> nfs share, but no longer.<br>
><br>
<br>
> Hi Hika:<br>
<br>
> This is what puzzles me. The master backend has the storage group<br>
> definition and the frontend slave backend does not. I just checked<br>
> with nload and it is clearly streaming from the frontend to the<br>
> master backend (maybe both) and the frontend wireless connection<br>
> cannot keep up with the network load.<br>
<br>
<br>
> Is this something that could be fixed? I have been meaning for a<br>
> while to contribute to mythtv and would not mind fixing this if<br>
> someone can point me to where in the code it would need to be adjusted.<br>
<br>
<br>
> Dan<br>
<br>
</div></div>Please don't top-post!<br>
<br>
I don't know, but I do know that wireless even with SD has to low<br>
bandwidth, unless sometimes when there is direct line of sight. So any<br>
backend, whether master or slave, should be cabled. And preferable at<br>
GB speed.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
Tot mails,<br>
Hika mailto:<a href="mailto:hikavdh@gmail.com">hikavdh@gmail.com</a><br>
<br>
"Zonder hoop kun je niet leven<br>
Zonder leven is er geen hoop<br>
Het eeuwige dilemma<br>
Zeker als je hoop moet vernietigen om te kunnen overleven!"<br>
<br>
De lerende Mens<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mythtv-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br>
<a href="http://wiki.mythtv.org/Mailing_List_etiquette" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://wiki.mythtv.org/Mailing_List_etiquette</a><br>
MythTV Forums: <a href="https://forum.mythtv.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://forum.mythtv.org</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Hika:<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Sorry, my mistake top posting. It has been a while since I posted to a newsgroup.<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Guess I will dig into it a bit then. My frontend is also under powered so the way it works now I could not watch anything while anything else is going on with the master backend. It does not make sense to me that routing inefficiently would be the preferred strategy.<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Dan<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br></div></div>