<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Raymond Wagner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:raymond@wagnerrp.com" target="_blank">raymond@wagnerrp.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><span>
<div>On 10/31/2014 1:03 PM, John Moore
(Compucom Systems Inc) wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"><span style="color:#1f497d">I am just totally taken by
surprise that MythTV cannot listen to more than 1 Network.</span></blockquote>
<br>
</span><span><div>On 10/31/2014 9:14 AM, John Moore
(Compucom Systems Inc) wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"><span style="color:#1f497d">The problem is a need to
keep the networks isolated which means more hardware to
accommodate a dedicated network.</span></blockquote>
<br></span>
I still don't understand this specific scenario. What's the
difference between MythTV sitting on two different networks and
listening on both, versus MythTV sitting on one network, and having
a routing process shovel packets from a second network at it? If
MythTV has access to both networks, those networks cannot be
considered isolated.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Raymond,</div><div><br></div><div>He and I chatted offline, and I can't really wrap my mind around his approach to networking. He has some really weird notion that it's better to put each VLAN on a separate switch. He says he can't add another VLAN until he spends $500 for another layer 3 switch because he doesn't like the idea of having a mix of vlans assigned to ports on the same switch... even though that's the whole reason that layer 3 switches were created in the first place.<br><br>Anyway... I don't think he wanted help, just wanted to understand why Mythtv only listens on a single IP.<br></div></div></div></div>