<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:17 AM, John Pilkington <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:J.Pilk@tesco.net" target="_blank">J.Pilk@tesco.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On 06/10/14 16:50, Kirk Bocek wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br><br>
RPMFusion only has 26.1 and nothing for CentOS 7:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/el/updates/6/x86_64/repoview/index.html" target="_blank">http://download1.rpmfusion.<u></u>org/free/el/updates/6/x86_64/<u></u>repoview/index.html</a><br>
<br>
Kind of a dead feel. I still think it was another repo though.<br></blockquote></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The problem with EL 6 is that it doesn't have the required version of QT so it's currently not possible to build anything newer within RPM Fusion as it has the same policies as EPEL/Fedora to not replace packages that are provided in other repos. That is not the case with ATRpms but they seem to be having other issues.</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Yes, rpmfusion does seem rather inactive, but Richard Shaw, who has built their most recent Myth packages, posted this yesterday<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'm not privy to the details, I'm just a packager on RPM Fusion but I know there is a lot of behind the scenes work being done to upgrade the infrastructure to match more with what Fedora is doing.</div><div><br></div><div>Currently, RPM Fusion uses cvs instead of git for scm repo and plague instead of koji for builds. There's no release mechanism like bodhi for Fedora, it's done manually. </div><div><br></div><div>We'll likely see RPM Fusion branch for EPEL 7 after the infrastructure is updated.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
<a href="http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/dev/576997#576997" target="_blank">http://www.gossamer-threads.<u></u>com/lists/mythtv/dev/576997#<u></u>576997</a><br>
<br>
"Out of curiosity I went to the trouble to figure out what packages are<br>
missing for EPEL 7 and was finally able to build MythTV binary packages."<br>
<br>
At present I have only have i686 and I believe RHEL comes in x86_64 only...</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, while EPEL 6 had x86_64 and i686, EPEL 7 is x86_64 only (at least on RPM Fusion). I think Fedora EPEL 7 also had ppc64 but that's probably not terribly useful for most people on this list.</div><div><br></div><div>Richard</div><div> </div></div></div></div>