<div dir="ltr">On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Nick Rout <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nick.rout@gmail.com" target="_blank">nick.rout@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=""><div class="h5">On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Tom Harris <<a href="mailto:thom.j.harris@gmail.com">thom.j.harris@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Nick Rout <<a href="mailto:nick.rout@gmail.com">nick.rout@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On May 9, 2014 11:08 PM, "Michael T. Dean" <<a href="mailto:mtdean@thirdcontact.com">mtdean@thirdcontact.com</a>><br>
>> wrote:<br>
>> ><br>
>> > On 05/08/2014 01:42 PM, Travis Tabbal wrote:<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> And I can bring another TV into the system for ~$50 (RPi, case, PSU, IR<br>
>> >> receiver).<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > Wow, I remember when MythTV was considered a high-end, luxury DVR<br>
>> > system. I guess now, you all want cheap (and, no, I don't mean<br>
>> > "inexpensive").<br>
>><br>
>> one factor is that reasonable TV panels are so cheap. I often see people<br>
>> wanting to kit out houses with 5 or more TVs. They balk at that many $2-300<br>
>> PC's but at $50 pis seems cheap. And yes the costs may vary widely depending<br>
>> where you live, but the pi is usually pretty cost effective no matter where<br>
>> you live.<br>
><br>
> Also, in the past it took a pretty strong PC to decode HDTV well. Now, all<br>
> these low end devices do HD playback nicely and it seems like they should be<br>
> able to easily handle another source (setting aside the MPEG2 decoding<br>
> issues which are a showstopper for most devices). I would love to take<br>
> advantage of the low size, power, heat, noise, etc. of one of the many new<br>
> streaming devices. Low cost is a bonus, but not really a requirement (for<br>
> me).<br>
><br>
> I think one of the bigger driving issues is the rapid increase in internet<br>
> content sources, requiring multiple devices, multiple remove controls (or<br>
> complex config in a universal remote), and using up all the HDMI inputs<br>
> people have.<br>
><br>
> I am most interested in alternate frontend options as a way to consolidate<br>
> devices. I'll dump my Roku3 in a heartbeat if I can find a device that<br>
> does Netflix, Amazon, HBO Go, and MythTV playback. I could probably also<br>
> dump my AppleTV if the new device can play my iTunes music directly or<br>
> through gateway software.<br>
><br>
<br>
</div></div>I believe Amazon FireTV does netflix and amazon. It does xbmc and<br>
therefore mythtv although unsure about 1080i mpeg2 deinterlacing (not<br>
so much a worry for those of us getting h264 on the tele). That only<br>
leaves HBO Go, and can't seem to see that on the amazon advertising.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yeah, you're right the FireTV is very close to being an excellent frontend device - with the deal killer of not being able to do HD MPEG2. </div>
<div><br></div><div>For these Android-ish devices, there is also the option of a few MythTV frontend apps (e.g. <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.mythtv">https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.mythtv</a> ). I'm really only interested in XBMC as a way to get to MythTV on more devices. An app that only does MythTV may be more palatable for myth users.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Of course, these apps also depend on the hardware being able to do accelerated MPEG2. So, ATSC users are still at the mercy of the hardware (or at least the license enabled features of the hardware).</div>
<div><br></div></div></div></div>