<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Raymond Wagner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:raymond@wagnerrp.com" target="_blank">raymond@wagnerrp.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">On 5/8/2014 8:14 AM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 08:10 -0400, Greg Thompson wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
I believe XBMC looks the same everywhere since they decided to use All<br>
OpenGL for their interface, rather than QT and a window manager...<br>
</blockquote></div>
And so yes, MythFE could copy that and shed baggage, etc., but again<div class=""><br>
with the shoulders of giants.<br>
</div></blockquote>
<br>
Every time that is suggested in earnest, it is met with all kinds of push back from users wanting to run on low end machines that don't have the GPU necessary to run OpenGL only.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Wouldn't that be a "vote" for XBMC on a RPi or Android device? Low power, and plays the content they want. </div>
</div><br></div></div>