<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><br><div><div>On May 8, 2014, at 7:26 PM, Jean-Yves Avenard <<a href="mailto:jyavenard@gmail.com">jyavenard@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><br><br>Le vendredi 9 mai 2014, Raymond Wagner <<a href="mailto:raymond@wagnerrp.com">raymond@wagnerrp.com</a>> a écrit :<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div><br></div>
Because the RPi is a piece of junk, with less CPU power than a
low-end frontend when MythTV was first released 10 years ago. It's
designed to be dirt cheap above all else, with all kinds of hardware
compromises along the way. You have a big GPU to make up for the
shortcomings in the CPU, but with no X support, it would require a
substantial amount of effort to port the UI to it, and there have
been far too widely mixed comments on how well it runs XBMC to call
it a "champ". I would at least choose one of the readily available
Cortex boards as a standard.<br>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Bashing continuously the pi as being a bit a "junk", can only highlight the fact the XBMC that has far more eye-candy than mythfrontend, runs just fine on it and myth don't. </div>
<div><br></div><div>What does that say about myth code then? </div></blockquote><br></div><div>Well Said!</div><div><br></div><div>Greg</div><br></body></html>